writing a debate about graffiti

Graffiti debate

I think graffiti is bad most of the time but sometimes it is creative and interesting.

One of the reasons why I think this is because of the type of “art’’. Sometimes graffiti can be really cool and different but other times it is such a mess and have swear words.

Some graffiti artists get paid to do their work because of how creative it is but others do it illegally all over the streets and most of the time that art is inappropriate.

It also depends on where the graffiti is. The reason I think this is because people might do graffiti all over famous city attractions and put down the people who were proud of them. It also is not right doing it on all sorts of properties without the owner's permission. There is an exception though when this is good because some artists have permission and do wonderful things to improve the surroundings.

It can be done to put someone down. Sometimes graffiti is depressing because often the graffiti artists do it for revenge and put bad depressing messages all over their properties or they put them every where because they are mean and nasty and like seeing people upset.

Graffiti can also cost a lot of money because of the clean up. Sometimes a lot of effort, time and money can go into a graffiti clean up. Also graffiti is done most of the time with spray paint so it will take a very long time to clean up this painted graffiti.

Graffiti can also be amazing art. Sometimes graffiti can be a great way to show off creative talents and amazing  different art pieces, with explosions of colour and personality.

Over all graffiti can often be bad but can also be good that is why I think sometimes graffiti is horrible and a mess and other times I think it is amazing.